PDA

View Full Version : Re: There is no defense against nuclear suicide bomber


QDurham
April 24th 04, 04:57 AM
>Of course a lot of
>folks would lose their freedom..but defense against this sort of
>things requires certain things to be stepped up....compromises made.
>
>Kenny L.

Jefferson or Hamilton or one of those people:

"That nation that exchanges a little freedom for a little security, loses both
and deserves neither." Amen

Quent

B2431
April 27th 04, 08:49 AM
>From: Matt Giwer
>
> And atomic and nuclear bombs are different ...


I don't know where you got that idea atomic bombs aren't nuclear. Atomic bombs
is the term usually applied to basic plutonium or uranium bombs. Thermonuclear
refers to hydrogen bombs. They are both nuclear.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Google